Hi Mark. This intrigues me. I've put various texts I've written through some AI detectors, including actual one to one interviews I've conducted, and had anywhere between 80% and 100% AI generated come back. In fact, the interview came back as 100%. Put this piece through others, including isitai.com, and it came back as 99.97% probability of being human. As Getty Image licences are too expensive for me on my own for the platform, and I'm not willing to pilfer images off the net which are copyrighted, I use Microsoft Co-Pilot to generate the images for all my pieces, something I'll continue to do as I like the way they look. Whether or not that plays a part, I don't know, but as handy as AI is to cobble together data, it is wildly inaccurate. And given accuracy and writing has been my career for 15 years, it's not something I am inclined to use given that it will, eventually, see me out of a profession.
Hi Mark. This intrigues me. I've put various texts I've written through some AI detectors, including actual one to one interviews I've conducted, and had anywhere between 80% and 100% AI generated come back. In fact, the interview came back as 100%. Put this piece through others, including isitai.com, and it came back as 99.97% probability of being human. As Getty Image licences are too expensive for me on my own for the platform, and I'm not willing to pilfer images off the net which are copyrighted, I use Microsoft Co-Pilot to generate the images for all my pieces, something I'll continue to do as I like the way they look. Whether or not that plays a part, I don't know, but as handy as AI is to cobble together data, it is wildly inaccurate. And given accuracy and writing has been my career for 15 years, it's not something I am inclined to use given that it will, eventually, see me out of a profession.